A) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because the defendant's product was not identical to the plaintiff's product.
B) That the trial court erred in refusing to require proof that the defendant had actual access to the trophy design at issue.
C) That the facts established a reasonable possibility that the manufacturer had access to the plaintiff's work and that considering the similarities between the works, the plaintiff was entitled to prevail.
D) That the trial court correctly found that proof of actual access to the infringed product was required, that actual access was established, and that the defendant's product was an exact copy of the plaintiff's product, thereby entitling the plaintiff to a judgment in its favor.
E) That the trial court correctly found that the defendant had access to the product but that copying was allowed because the plaintiff had not properly protected its work.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Profits
B) Receipts
C) Royalties
D) Payoffs
E) Illegal
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Interstate
B) Intrastate
C) Interstate and intrastate
D) Commercial
E) Interstate, intrastate, and commercial
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The possibility of bridging the gap
B) The possibility of twin competition
C) The possibility of building the bridge
D) The possibility of sweeping the product
E) The possibility of actual confusion
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Product trademark
B) Collective mark
C) Certification mark
D) Service mark
E) Physical activity mark
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 66 of 66
Related Exams