A) Promise of tranquility
B) Agreement of quiet
C) Covenant of quiet enjoyment
D) Contract of enjoyment
E) Contract of tranquility
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) In the majority of states, the landlord is required to remove the previous tenant or break the agreement with the new tenant.
B) In a majority of states, the landlord is required to simply provide legal possession of the premises and has no responsibility to see that the previous tenant leaves.
C) In a majority of states Bob and Brenda would have to split any costs involved in removing Connie from the premises.
D) In a majority of states, Bob would be required to initiate legal action to remove Connie, but he would be entitled to reimbursement from Bob.
E) In a majority of states, Bob could have Brenda put in jail if she did not have Connie removed within 30 days.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because judges favored lessors.
B) Because the standard of living was lower.
C) Because land was viewed as the more important element being leased.
D) Because it was believed that the free economy should take care of such matters.
E) Because of the large need for premises to lease.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She made an assignment
B) She made a sublease
C) She made a lease transfer
D) She made a sublet
E) She made a rental swap agreement
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Christen owes no duty to pay any rent to Dusty because she validly transferred her rights and obligations under the lease.
B) Christen only owes a duty to pay Dusty if Doug has been declared bankrupt by the bankruptcy court.
C) Christen only owes a duty to pay Dusty if she agreed with Doug that she would do so if he became unable to pay.
D) Christen only owes a duty to pay Dusty only if Doug committed waste on the property.
E) Christen owes a duty to pay Dusty.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 65 of 65
Related Exams