A) Within 10 days
B) Within 30 days
C) Before midnight of the next day
D) Within 7 days
E) Within 48 hours
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Rejected
B) Converted
C) Dishonored
D) Refused
E) Destroyed
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Endorser
B) Acceptor
C) Drawer
D) Promisor
E) Maker
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Floyd is only entitled to payment from Hema because Anne dishonored the payment.
B) Floyd is never entitled payment from Hema because he must seek recovery only from Anne.
C) Floyd is not entitled to payment from Hema unless Rahul,in addition to Anne,dishonors the instrument.
D) Floyd is entitled to recover on the note from Hema only if both Anne and Rahul have filed bankruptcy or are otherwise proven insolvent.
E) Floyd is entitled to recover on the note from Hema.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The Furniture Shop
B) Rabia,as primary owner of The Furniture Shop
C) Chloe
D) Chloe's bank.
E) Rabia's bank.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Infancy being below the legal age of consent) ,to the extent that it makes a contract void
B) Impairment of collateral
C) Discharge through insolvency proceedings bankruptcy)
D) Forgery
E) Fraud in the factum
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,the "X" could constitute a signature,but only if Branson also printed his name on the note.
B) No,because the "X" does not constitute a signature because it does not identify the endorser.
C) No,a signature is required to hold a party liable for a negotiable instrument.
D) Yes,because the "X" Branson wrote on the instrument could constitute a signature if Branson used it with the intent to authenticate the instrument.
E) No,public policy would not support holding a party liable for payment if that party did not actually sign the instrument.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,Garren only told Dexter about the promissory note and never exhibited the promissory note to Dexter,therefore there was no presentment and Dexter did not dishonor the note.
B) Yes.
C) No,Garren did not present the note in a timely manner,therefore Dexter did not dishonor the note.
D) No,Garren was not a proper party,therefore Dexter did not dishonor the note.
E) No,although Garren met the requirements for presentment and Dexter refused to pay,he did not explicitly dishonor the note.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The principal can receive reimbursement from makers of the checks only.
B) Because the checks were forged,the principal can receive reimbursement of the funds from any maker involved or any bank that cashed the checks.
C) The principal can recover from either the makers or any banks who cashed the checks only if it can be shown that the agent cannot be located for criminal prosecution.
D) The principal can receive reimbursement from any bank that cashed the checks only.
E) It is likely that it will be determined that the principal ratified the signatures and that the principal cannot recover from either makers or banks that cashed the checks.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Reacquisition
B) Release
C) Renunciation
D) Cancellation
E) Recourse
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Acknowledgement
B) Pre-approval
C) Ratification
D) Post-approval
E) Authorization
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A party who has secondary liability.
B) A party who has maker liability.
C) A party who has acceptor liability.
D) A party who has recognition liability.
E) A party who has transfer liability.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the defending bank had no right to return the check because by accepting the check,it became accountable for it.
B) That the bank had no right to return the check because the check was written by one of its customers.
C) That the defending bank had until midnight on April 10 to return the check and that it,therefore,did not act in a timely manner.
D) That the defending bank had until midnight on April 11 to return the check and that it,therefore,acted in a timely manner in doing so.
E) That the defending bank had no right to return the check because the check had already gone through the Federal Reserve System.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The individual who orders the cashier's check and from whose account the payment is drawn.
B) The endorser of cashier's check.
C) No entity is primarily liable on a cashier's check.
D) The individual who orders the check is primarily liable;the bank is secondarily liable.
E) The bank that issues the cashier's check,as the bank is the maker of the check.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,because the notice does not identify the instrument in question.
B) Yes,because if the word "dishonor" on the instrument is sufficient to constitute notice.
C) No,unless Garren specifically states that he is dishonoring the note.
D) No,because simply writing "dishonor" is insufficient to constitute notice.
E) No,because Garren did not sign his name.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams