Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A loss sustained by a client in a suit brought under common law.
B) A loss sustained by a lender not in privity of contract in a suit brought in a state court which adheres to the Ultramares v.Touche precedent.
C) A loss sustained by initial purchasers of stock in a suit brought under the Securities Act of 1933.
D) A loss sustained by a bank named as a third-party beneficiary in the engagement letter in a suit brought under common law.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There was fraudulent activity by Baldridge.
B) There was a material misstatement in the financial statements.
C) Wilson relied on Baldridge's opinion.
D) Wilson was in privity with Baldridge.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the audit was performed in accordance with GAAS.
B) Fleming had no knowledge of the embezzlement.
C) The financial statements were presented in conformity with GAAP.
D) The controller was Walton's agent and as such had designed the controls which facilitated the embezzlement.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Option A
B) Option B
C) Option C
D) Option D
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lack of due diligence.
B) Intent to deceive or defraud.
C) Ordinary negligence.
D) Auditors have no liability to security purchasers under this act.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) $0
B) $400,000
C) $1,000,000
D) $2,000,000
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Win because there was no privity of contract between Hark and Third.
B) Lose because Hark knew that a bank would be relaying the financial statements.
C) Win because Third was contributory negligent in granting the loan.
D) Lose because Hark was negligent in performing the audit.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) CPAs are normally liable to their clients,the shareholders,for either ordinary or gross negligence.
B) CPAs are liable for either ordinary or gross negligence to identified third parties for whose benefit the audit was performed.
C) CPAs may escape all personal liability through incorporation as a limited liability corporation.
D) CPAs are guilty until they prove that they performed the audit with "good faith."
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ordinary negligence.
B) Gross negligence.
C) Strict liability.
D) Criminal deceit.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Option A
B) Option B
C) Option C
D) Option D
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The CPA is liable only to third parties in privity of contract with the CPA.
B) The CPA is liable only to known users of the financial statements.
C) The CPA probably is liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud.
D) The CPA probably is liable to the client even if the client was aware of the fraud and did not rely on the opinion.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Gives a client an oral report instead of a written report.
B) Gives a client incorrect advice based on an honest error of judgment.
C) Fails to give tax advice that saves the client money.
D) Fails to follow generally accepted auditing standards.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 61
Related Exams