Filters
Question type
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) If p, then q. q. Therefore, p.
B) If p, then q. If q, then r. Therefore, if p, then r.
C) Either p or q. Not p. Therefore, q.
D) If p, then q. Not q. Therefore, not p.
E) B) and C)
F) All of the above
F) All of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) invalid.
B) strong.
C) valid.
D) weak.
E) B) and D)
F) A) and B)
F) A) and B)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) true; false
B) false; false
C) false; true
D) true; true
E) None of the above
F) All of the above
F) All of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Diagramming an argument involves breaking down the structure of an argument to visually represent the relationships between its components. The steps involved in diagramming an argument are as follows:
1. Identify the main conclusion: Determine the main point or conclusion of the argument.
2. Identify the premises: Identify the reasons or evidence provided to support the main conclusion.
3. Determine the relationships: Determine how the premises support the main conclusion. This may involve identifying sub-conclusions or intermediate conclusions within the argument.
4. Create a visual representation: Use symbols, lines, and labels to visually represent the relationships between the main conclusion, premises, and any sub-conclusions.
5. Evaluate the argument: Review the diagram to assess the strength of the argument and identify any potential weaknesses or gaps in reasoning.
To illustrate these steps, consider the following sample argument:
Argument:
Premise 1: All humans are mortal.
Premise 2: Socrates is a human.
Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
Diagram:
All humans are mortal (Premise 1)
Socrates is a human (Premise 2)
Therefore, Socrates is mortal (Conclusion)
In this example, the main conclusion is "Socrates is mortal," supported by the premises "All humans are mortal" and "Socrates is a human." The diagram visually represents the relationship between the premises and the main conclusion, showing how the premises lead to the conclusion.
By following these steps, one can effectively diagram an argument to better understand its structure and evaluate its reasoning.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Diagramming an argument involves breaking down the structure of an argument to visually represent the relationships between its components. The steps involved in diagramming an argument are as follows:
1. Identify the main conclusion: Determine the main point or conclusion of the argument.
2. Identify the premises: Identify the reasons or evidence provided to support the main conclusion.
3. Determine the relationships: Determine how the premises support the main conclusion. This may involve identifying sub-conclusions or intermediate conclusions within the argument.
4. Create a visual representation: Use symbols, lines, and labels to visually represent the relationships between the main conclusion, premises, and any sub-conclusions.
5. Evaluate the argument: Review the diagram to assess the strength of the argument and identify any potential weaknesses or gaps in reasoning.
To illustrate these steps, consider the following sample argument:
Argument:
Premise 1: All humans are mortal.
Premise 2: Socrates is a human.
Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
Diagram:
All humans are mortal (Premise 1)
Socrates is a human (Premise 2)
Therefore, Socrates is mortal (Conclusion)
In this example, the main conclusion is "Socrates is mortal," supported by the premises "All humans are mortal" and "Socrates is a human." The diagram visually represents the relationship between the premises and the main conclusion, showing how the premises lead to the conclusion.
By following these steps, one can effectively diagram an argument to better understand its structure and evaluate its reasoning.
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Modus tollens and denying the antecedent are both forms of logical arguments that involve conditional statements, but they are fundamentally different in their structure and validity.
Modus tollens, also known as "denying the consequent," is a valid form of deductive argument. It has the following structure:
1. If P, then Q. (Conditional statement)
2. Not Q. (Denial of the consequent)
3. Therefore, not P. (Conclusion)
In modus tollens, if the conditional statement is true and the consequent (Q) is false, then it logically follows that the antecedent (P) must also be false. This form of argument is valid because it correctly applies the rules of logical inference.
Denying the antecedent, on the other hand, is an invalid form of argument. It has the following structure:
1. If P, then Q. (Conditional statement)
2. Not P. (Denial of the antecedent)
3. Therefore, not Q. (Conclusion)
This form of argument is invalid because it makes an incorrect inference. Just because the antecedent (P) is false, it does not necessarily follow that the consequent (Q) is also false. There could be other reasons or conditions that could make Q true, independent of P.
The two major differences between modus tollens and denying the antecedent are:
1. Validity: Modus tollens is a valid argument form, meaning that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Denying the antecedent is an invalid argument form; even if the premises are true, the conclusion may still be false.
2. Logical Structure: Modus tollens correctly infers the falsity of the antecedent from the falsity of the consequent, which is a valid logical move. Denying the antecedent incorrectly infers the falsity of the consequent from the falsity of the antecedent, which is a logical error.
In summary, modus tollens is a valid argument form that correctly applies logical inference, while denying the antecedent is an invalid argument form that makes an incorrect logical leap.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Modus tollens and denying the antecedent are both forms of logical arguments that involve conditional statements, but they are fundamentally different in their structure and validity.
Modus tollens, also known as "denying the consequent," is a valid form of deductive argument. It has the following structure:
1. If P, then Q. (Conditional statement)
2. Not Q. (Denial of the consequent)
3. Therefore, not P. (Conclusion)
In modus tollens, if the conditional statement is true and the consequent (Q) is false, then it logically follows that the antecedent (P) must also be false. This form of argument is valid because it correctly applies the rules of logical inference.
Denying the antecedent, on the other hand, is an invalid form of argument. It has the following structure:
1. If P, then Q. (Conditional statement)
2. Not P. (Denial of the antecedent)
3. Therefore, not Q. (Conclusion)
This form of argument is invalid because it makes an incorrect inference. Just because the antecedent (P) is false, it does not necessarily follow that the consequent (Q) is also false. There could be other reasons or conditions that could make Q true, independent of P.
The two major differences between modus tollens and denying the antecedent are:
1. Validity: Modus tollens is a valid argument form, meaning that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Denying the antecedent is an invalid argument form; even if the premises are true, the conclusion may still be false.
2. Logical Structure: Modus tollens correctly infers the falsity of the antecedent from the falsity of the consequent, which is a valid logical move. Denying the antecedent incorrectly infers the falsity of the consequent from the falsity of the antecedent, which is a logical error.
In summary, modus tollens is a valid argument form that correctly applies logical inference, while denying the antecedent is an invalid argument form that makes an incorrect logical leap.
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The procedure for determining whether an...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The procedure for determining whether an...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The counterexample method is a logical a...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The counterexample method is a logical a...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
It is useful to know basic argument form...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
It is useful to know basic argument form...
View Answer
A) disjunction.
B) hypothetical.
C) conditional.
D) syllogism.
E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)
F) A) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
An argument is considered valid if the c...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
An argument is considered valid if the c...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The text you are referring to is not provided, so I cannot directly quote the four basic steps in assessing a long argument from it. However, I can give you a general outline of the steps typically involved in assessing any long argument:
1. **Identify the Main Conclusion**: The first step is to determine what the main point or conclusion of the argument is. This is the statement that the argument is trying to persuade you to accept.
2. **Outline the Supporting Evidence**: Once the main conclusion is identified, the next step is to outline the evidence or reasons that are presented to support this conclusion. This involves breaking down the argument into its constituent premises.
3. **Evaluate the Validity and Soundness**: After identifying the conclusion and the supporting evidence, you should evaluate the logical structure of the argument. This means checking if the argument is valid (if the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and sound (if the premises are true).
4. **Consider Counterarguments and Objections**: The final step is to consider any potential counterarguments or objections to the argument. This involves thinking critically about the weaknesses in the argument and whether the conclusion can be challenged.
These steps are a basic framework for critical thinking and analysis of arguments, and they can be applied to most long arguments you will encounter in writing or debate. Keep in mind that the specific steps or terminology might vary slightly depending on the context or the source of the information.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The text you are referring to is not provided, so I cannot directly quote the four basic steps in assessing a long argument from it. However, I can give you a general outline of the steps typically involved in assessing any long argument:
1. **Identify the Main Conclusion**: The first step is to determine what the main point or conclusion of the argument is. This is the statement that the argument is trying to persuade you to accept.
2. **Outline the Supporting Evidence**: Once the main conclusion is identified, the next step is to outline the evidence or reasons that are presented to support this conclusion. This involves breaking down the argument into its constituent premises.
3. **Evaluate the Validity and Soundness**: After identifying the conclusion and the supporting evidence, you should evaluate the logical structure of the argument. This means checking if the argument is valid (if the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and sound (if the premises are true).
4. **Consider Counterarguments and Objections**: The final step is to consider any potential counterarguments or objections to the argument. This involves thinking critically about the weaknesses in the argument and whether the conclusion can be challenged.
These steps are a basic framework for critical thinking and analysis of arguments, and they can be applied to most long arguments you will encounter in writing or debate. Keep in mind that the specific steps or terminology might vary slightly depending on the context or the source of the information.
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The two basic forms of argument are dedu...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The two basic forms of argument are dedu...
View Answer
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 36
Related Exams