A) international city
B) international corporation
C) state
D) foreign subsidiary
E) national subsidiary
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The EU.
B) The civil law system.
C) The common law system.
D) The United States legal system.
E) The socialist legal system.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Express warranties and the implied warranty of merchantability arising from the sale of goods.
B) Actual and express warranties but not the implied warranty of merchantability arising from the sale of goods.
C) Express warranties and the implied warranty of merchantability arising from the sale of goods but not actual warranties.
D) Express warranties only.
E) The implied warranty of merchantability arising from the sale of goods only.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Franchisor; Franchisee
B) Franchisee; Franchisor
C) Affiliator; Affiliatee
D) Venturor; Venturee
E) Representative Offeror; Representative Offeree
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No. The UCC requires that contracts for the sale of goods in excess of $500 be in writing, however, the CISG does not require a writing.
B) No. The CISG requires that contracts for the sale of goods in excess of $500 be in writing, however, the UCC does not require a writing.
C) Yes, both the UCC and the CISG require that contracts for the sale of goods be in writing.
D) No. The UCC requires that all contracts for the sale of goods be in writing, however, the CISG does not require a writing.
E) No. The CISG requires that all contracts for the sale of goods be in writing, however, the UCC does not require a writing.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) A trade embargo
B) A ban on the sale of lambswool
C) A quota or limit on the amount of imported units
D) A fee based on the weight of the imported units
E) A ban on trade with Canada
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Mediation
B) Arbitration
C) Neutral evaluation
D) International evaluation
E) Multi-cultural evaluation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is nothing she can do.
B) She should insert a forum selection clause in the contract.
C) She should insert a choice-of-law clause in the contract.
D) She should insert a Hague evidence clause in the contract.
E) She should insert a GATT clause into the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because the D2000 was shipped to Illinois.
B) Yes, if the value of Reymond's claim is over $50,000.
C) No, because Illinois has general personal jurisdiction over DroneTek.
D) Yes, because the D2000 entered the stream of commerce.
E) No, because DroneTek has not purposefully availed itself of the protections of the Illinois forum.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lex Mercatoria
B) Lex Seller
C) Ad Merchandiso
D) Lex Loci
E) Res Judicata
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Worker's rights issues
B) Free trade in Central America
C) Child labor
D) Equal pay for equal work
E) The right to strike
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A written agreement between Congress and the judicial branch and a bilateral treaty
B) Executive agreement and congressional mandate
C) Judicial decree and congressional mandate
D) Treaties and executive agreements
E) Decree and congressional mandate
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The U.S. Supreme Court has held that U.S. courts may disregard customary international law.
B) The U.S. Supreme Court has held that even if a governing international agreement says otherwise, a U.S. court must rely on customary international law.
C) The U.S. Supreme Court has held that even if a controlling executive act is to the contrary, U.S. courts must rely on customary international law.
D) The U.S. Supreme Court has held that regardless of the existence of any legislative act to the contrary, U.S. courts must rely on customary international law.
E) The U.S. Supreme Court has held that in the absence of a governing international agreement or controlling executive or legislative act or judicial decision, U.S. courts must rely on customary international law.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams