Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Creditor
B) Donee
C) Incidental
D) Promised
E) Avowed
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Theresa will win because Huan's attempted assignment would increase the duties to which she agreed.
B) Theresa will win because all assignments are invalid without the obligor's consent.
C) Theresa will win unless Huan paid her the $300 in advance in which case Huan will win.
D) Huan will win because he may validly assign the contract without Theresa's consent.
E) Huan will win so long as he tells Theresa about the assignment prior to the time she begins any performance whatsoever.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) donee
B) creditor
C) incidental
D) accidental
E) negligent
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An incidental beneficiary may sue to enforce incidental contractual rights so long as those rights have vested.
B) An incidental beneficiary may sue to enforce incidental contractual rights only if the incidental beneficiary was once a creditor beneficiary.
C) An incidental beneficiary may sue to enforce incidental contractual rights only if the incidental beneficiary was once a donee beneficiary.
D) An incidental beneficiary may sue to enforce incidental contractual rights only if the incidental beneficiary is also a second-party beneficiary.
E) An incidental beneficiary cannot sue to enforce a contract which provided incidental benefits.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Transferor
B) Transferee
C) Relator
D) Assignor
E) Assignee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The English rule
B) The last-assignment-in-time rule
C) The first-assignment-in-time rule
D) The French rule
E) The American rule
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Intended and donee
B) Creditor and incidental
C) Intended and creditor
D) Donee and incidental
E) Creditor and donee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) transferor, transferee
B) transferee, transferor
C) creditor, debtor
D) assignor, assignee
E) assignee, assignor
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Stephanie is correct because a personal service was involved.
B) Stephanie is correct because the contract did not specifically give Jamal the right to assign the contract.
C) Stephanie is correct because a delegation, as well as an assignment, was involved.
D) Stephanie is incorrect because the contract was not for the performance of a personal service, and there was no requirement that the contract specifically reference the right to assign rights and duties.
E) Stephanie is incorrect only because the contract and assignment were for an amount under $1,000. Otherwise, Jamal had no right to assign the contract without her permission.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Kristi can enforce the assignment only if the agreement that Kurt and Jennifer had was in writing.
B) Kristi can enforce the assignment.
C) Kristi cannot enforce the assignment because it was not in writing.
D) Kristi cannot enforce the assignment because Kurt did not specifically grant Jennifer the power to assign the contract.
E) Kristi cannot enforce the assignment because assignments to purchase property cannot ever be assigned for public policy reasons.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Promisee
B) Promisor
C) Obligor
D) Obligee
E) Assignor
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because the antiassignment clause prohibits the assignment.
B) No, because it would increase Ned's duties to have to pay Melissa.
C) Yes, but only if the assignment complies with the statute of frauds.
D) Yes, because antiassignment clauses do not affect the right to receive damages for breach of contract to sell goods or services.
E) Yes, because antiassignment clauses are no longer valid if any part of the contract is not performed.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Assignments made by operation of law may be assigned, but no other assignments may be made in the presence of an antiassignment clause.
B) Assignments for the right to receive monetary payments may be assigned, but no other assignments may be made in the presence of an antiassignment clause.
C) Assignments made by operation of law, assignments for the right to receive monetary payments, and assignments for the right to receive damages for a breach of contract to sell goods or services may be assigned even in the presence of an antiassignment clause.
D) No contractual rights or duties may be assigned in the presence of an antiassignment clause.
E) Antiassignment clauses are void as against public policy and have no effect on the right of assignment.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Bobby will win because Jaya cannot avoid her obligations through a delegation.
B) Bobby will win but only because he was not aware of the assignment.
C) Bobby will win but only because the contract was for an amount under $1,000.
D) Bobby will win only if Laura cannot be found for service of process.
E) Jaya will win because she delegated the duty of payment to Laura.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 90
Related Exams