A) Oppressive conduct
B) Majority holder misconduct
C) Minority oppression
D) Minority discrimination
E) Disloyal procedure
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Directors and officers
B) Officers and shareholders
C) Directors only
D) Officers only
E) Shareholders
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) illegal
B) invalid
C) irresponsible
D) debts
E) credits
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because she was acting within the scope of her authority.
B) Yes, because the business judgment rule protects directors and officers from being held accountable for bad decisions.
C) No, because the business judgment rule is an exception to the fiduciary duty of board members.
D) No, because the business judgment rule does not apply to executives.
E) No, because she did not act in good faith.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Meeting agenda
B) Proxy materials
C) Presidential materials
D) Officer materials
E) Meeting proposals
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That in awarding the bonus, the majority shareholder violated the duty of loyalty she owed to the company.
B) That in awarding the bonus, the majority shareholder violated the duty of care she owed to the company.
C) That in awarding the bonus, the majority shareholder violated the business judgment rule.
D) That the majority shareholder was guilty of no violation in awarding the bonus.
E) That the majority shareholder's vote to award the bonus would be upheld only if she submitted additional proof that the bonus was deserved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No-par stock
B) Reduced stock
C) Watered stock
D) Less-value stock
E) Unapproved stock
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) associated director.
B) accompanying director.
C) intermediary director.
D) affiliated director.
E) unaffiliated directors.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) first rights
B) superior rights
C) preemptive rights
D) initial rights
E) shareholder's rights
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The superior judgment rule.
B) The research and investigation rule.
C) The business judgment rule.
D) The rule of corporate integrity.
E) There is no defense.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) All shareholders have a fiduciary duty not to compete with the company
B) No shareholders ever have any legal duties
C) Shareholders typically have few legal duties, but majority shareholders can sometimes have fiduciary duties to the corporation and to minority shareholders
D) Shareholders typically have few legal duties, but minority shareholders can sometimes have fiduciary duties to the corporation and to majority shareholders
E) Shareholders have a fiduciary duty to each other, but not to the corporation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) He cannot be held responsible because the corporation released the drug.
B) He cannot be held responsible because he was unaware of the dangers of the drug.
C) He can be held responsible for his own torts and crimes and for the crimes of other employees whom they have failed to adequately supervise.
D) He cannot be held responsible if the board of directors approved the release of the drug.
E) He cannot be held responsible because the illegal actions of hiding the drug's side effects were done by a subordinate.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Nothing because Tatiana did not engage in any wrongdoing.
B) She will be required to cede to the corporation all the profits she earned as a result of the breach.
C) She will be required to cede to the corporation only profits she earned as a result of the breach that the corporation can prove by a preponderance of the evidence it lost as a result of her actions.
D) She will be required to cede to the corporation any profits she earned as a result of the breach unless she can by a preponderance of the evidence prove that the corporation lost no sales as a result of her actions.
E) She will be required to cede to the corporation half of any profits she earned as a result of the breach.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) At the will of the president.
B) In the discretion of the shareholders upon majority vote.
C) In the discretion of the shareholders upon a two-thirds vote.
D) In the discretion of other directors upon a majority vote.
E) For cause.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Right of adequate refusal
B) Right of first refusal
C) Right of first purchase
D) Right of first acknowledgement
E) Superior right of purchase
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the business judgment rule does not apply in such situations and that so long as there is any business reason for a transaction, a corporation cannot be found liable for a "squeeze-out" resulting in dismissal of the plaintiff's claims.
B) That while the business judgment rule applied, the corporation submitted sufficient evidence to establish legitimate reasons for all questioned transactions and that it, therefore, could not be held liable to the complaining minority shareholder.
C) That a material question of fact as to whether the directors could be found to have engaged in a "squeeze-out" of the beneficiary, causing him harm beyond every other shareholder, and that the case would be remanded for further proceedings.
D) That because he owned over 20% of the stock, the failure to grant the complaining minority shareholder a seat on the board in and of itself was sufficient under the facts presented to establish that the corporation was guilty of behavior constituting an illegal "squeeze-out."
E) That the failure to declare a dividend when sufficient assets existed with which to do so in and of itself was sufficient under the facts presented to establish that the corporation was guilty of behavior constituting an illegal "squeeze-out."
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 6 months
B) 11 months
C) One year
D) Two years
E) Three years
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 90
Related Exams